mfamessagingstrategy

How Carrier and OS RCS Advances Change Multi‑Factor Authentication Roadmaps

ffindme

2026-02-22

11 min read

As RCS E2EE and carrier attestation reach mobile stacks, rework MFA roadmaps to replace fragile SMS flows with verified, low‑friction methods.

Why every authentication architect should care about RCS advances in 2026

Hook: If your team still relies on SMS one‑time passcodes for account recovery or primary MFA, recent carrier and OS changes to RCS (Rich Communication Services) should force a rethink of your authentication roadmap — now. Messaging security upgrades across Android and iOS, carrier support for end‑to‑end encryption, and new verification signals create an opportunity to retire fragile telephony‑based flows and deliver stronger, lower‑friction MFA that scales.

Executive summary (most important insights first)

In late 2025 and early 2026 the mobile ecosystem accelerated two parallel trends that materially affect MFA design:

OS vendors added support for E2EE RCS. Apple’s iOS beta and Android stacks now include MLS (Message Layer Security) signalling for encrypted RCS conversations, bringing true end‑to‑end encryption across device ecosystems in regions where carriers enable it.
Carriers and the GSMA pushed richer, verifiable metadata. Updated Universal Profile specifications and operator APIs now expose verified sender indicators, operator attestation for phone‑number ownership, and improved delivery/receipt signals.

For security teams, the combination of cryptographic protection, stronger sender attestation, and richer messaging hooks means you can design MFA flows that are both more secure and less user‑friction than SMS OTPs — but only if you update your roadmap to account for variability in carrier support, privacy rules, and fallback strategies.

What changed in 2025–2026: the technical state of play

Key public developments that matter for MFA:

MLS adoption in mobile stacks. Apple’s iOS beta signaled MLS support for RCS (iOS 26.x beta channel), and Android vendors rolled MLS signaling into their RCS clients in late 2025. That enables E2EE RCS sessions between iPhone and Android when carriers permit.
GSMA Universal Profile 3.x features. The GSMA’s evolution of the Universal Profile standard added verified sender and new metadata types designed for business messaging and authentication use cases.
Operator APIs and verified messaging. Several carriers in Europe, LATAM and parts of APAC exposed APIs to attest number ownership and message delivery states to enterprise platforms. Carrier rollouts in the US are ongoing as of early 2026.
Privacy and regulatory attention. Regulators in the EU and privacy laws globally tightened requirements on telephony signals and biometric identifiers; data residency and explicit consent controls have become standard expectations for telephony‑based identity efforts.

Sources: See coverage of Apple’s beta RCS E2EE work (e.g., Android Authority) and GSMA Universal Profile updates for technical specifics.

Why RCS improvements matter for MFA

RCS changes shift the trust and attack model for telephony‑based authentication:

Lower network‑level interception risk. E2EE makes passive network interception (SS7/SS7‑like threats, rogue IMS proxies) less useful for attackers.
Better sender identity signals. Verified sender metadata reduces impersonation risk from spoofed SMS sender IDs.
Richer client UX and richer payloads. RCS supports interactive, branded verification cards, consent flows, and client‑side cryptographic bindings that SMS cannot provide.
Stronger attestation options. Carrier APIs allow attesting that a number is in the control of a user/session — not absolute, but much more robust than SMS reachability alone.

In short: the combination shrinks the attack surface that made SMS OTPs easy to abuse, while enabling push‑style verification flows under operator control.

What you should NOT do: common mistakes to avoid

Don’t blindly swap SMS OTP for RCS OTP. Carriers and countries will vary; RCS E2EE can be disabled by carrier policy and device capability differences mean you must handle fallbacks.
Don’t assume number attestation equals identity. Operator attestation helps confirm possession of a phone number in a moment — it is not a substitute for account‑level identity checks or biometrics for high‑value transactions.
Don’t ignore privacy consent. New metadata and attestation signals carry legal obligations around storage, disclosure and user consent — especially in EU/UK jurisdictions after ePrivacy updates in 2025–26.
Don’t remove other resilient factors. Device binding, passkeys and WebAuthn should still be primary where possible.

Practical roadmap: how to evolve your MFA program in 4 phases

The following phased roadmap is designed for security engineering teams, dev teams and IT admins who must balance security, compliance and user experience.

Phase 0 — Inventory & signal detection (0–3 months)

Inventory all flows that use SMS/telco as primary or backup authentication (login, password reset, transaction confirmation, account recovery).
Implement RCS capability detection at runtime. Use carrier/OS client capability APIs (or detection libraries) to record whether a device supports RCS, MLS/E2EE, and verified sender flags.
Instrument metrics: SMS OTP success rate, delivery latency, fallback rate, fraud incidents tied to SMS flows.
Run a privacy and compliance impact assessment focused on telephony data retention and attestation signals.

Phase 1 — Low‑risk pilots (3–6 months)

Start small and measurably improve UX and security.

Implement RCS as an alternative authentication channel for low‑risk flows (e.g., low‑value confirmations, newsletter signups). If RCS verified sender is available, render a branded verification card instead of raw code text.
Measure: conversion, completion time, user complaints, and fraud rates versus SMS.
Deploy operator attestation where available: request attestation tokens for the given number during the flow and store minimal metadata (hashes + timestamp) for auditability.
Keep SMS as fallback, but flag any account that routinely uses the fallback for escalation checks.

Phase 2 — Strengthen for high‑value authentication (6–12 months)

Move high‑risk flows away from SMS OTP as primary. Favor the following hierarchy: Passkeys (FIDO/WebAuthn) → RCS verified push + attestation → Signed push notifications → TOTP / Authenticator apps → SMS OTP (last resort).
For RCS, implement short‑lived cryptographic challenges bound to the device session. Example pattern: generate server challenge, sign with server key, send an RCS verification card that the client verifies via MLS metadata.
Use risk‑based adaptive policies: require second factor (e.g., WebAuthn) when attestation is missing or number portability / recent porting is detected.
Integrate number porting/SIM swap detection via third‑party providers and carrier APIs where available.

Phase 3 — Platformize and retire unsafe flows (12–24 months)

Platformize your MFA logic into a reusable service: capability detection, attestation verification, session binding, analytics and fallback controls.
Gradually deprecate SMS OTP in favor of stronger channels for all but the most constrained user segments. Offer users an easy migration path to passkeys and authenticator apps.
Formalize SLAs and monitoring for carrier APIs; automate retries and fallbacks to minimize user lockout while preserving security thresholds.
Engage with carriers/operators strategically. Establish relationships, agree on attestation formats and operational contacts for incidents.

Technical patterns and example implementations

Below are patterns and example snippets to implement modern RCS‑aware MFA. These are platform‑agnostic patterns; adapt to your chosen RCS provider (Google RCS Business Messaging, operator RBM, or vendor gateways).

Pattern: Server‑generated signed challenge delivered via RCS

Flow summary:

User requests verification.
Server generates JSON challenge {user_id, session_id, nonce, exp} and signs it with the server's private key.
Server sends a branded RCS verification card containing the signed challenge.
Client RCS client (MLS‑enabled) receives the card; client SDK verifies message E2EE metadata and displays a single‑tap “Approve” action.
When user taps Approve, the client posts the signed challenge back to your server over HTTPS, including the device attestation token if available.
Server verifies the signature, validates attestation and binds session.

Node.js pseudocode: verify inbound RCS webhook with HMAC

// Express route example: verify inbound RCS webhook (pseudocode)
app.post('/webhook/rcs', (req, res) => {
  const raw = req.rawBody; // body bytes
  const signature = req.get('X-Signature');
  const expected = crypto.createHmac('sha256', process.env.PROVIDER_SECRET)
                        .update(raw)
                        .digest('hex');
  if (!crypto.timingSafeEqual(Buffer.from(signature), Buffer.from(expected))) {
    return res.status(401).send('Invalid signature');
  }

  const payload = JSON.parse(raw);
  // payload.example: { type: 'delivery', message: { id, text, metadata } }
  handleRcsMessage(payload);
  res.status(200).send('ok');
});

Note: real RCS providers use different auth schemes (OAuth, JWT, or HMAC). Use provider docs and verify MLS metadata client‑side where possible.

Integrating carrier attestation tokens

Where carriers support attestation, they return a signed attestation token asserting that the number is reachable and held by a subscriber at a given time. Treat these tokens like any cryptographic credential:

Verify signature against a trusted operator or GSMA key set.
Validate timestamps and nonce linkage to your session.
Store only hashes and minimal audit metadata to satisfy privacy rules.

Compliance and privacy guardrails

Every telephony signal and RCS metadata field you capture can be regulated. Follow these rules:

Minimize storage. Keep only hashed attestation tokens and timestamps necessary for audits; purge raw tokens per retention policy.
Log consent and purpose. Collect explicit consent if you will use carrier‑provided attestation beyond immediate verification (e.g., fraud scoring).
Data residency. If your verification architecture crosses regions, use geo‑aware services to avoid unauthorized cross‑border transfer of telephony metadata.
Disclosure in privacy policy. Make clear what messaging signals you use and why (e.g., number attestation for fraud prevention).

UX & app design: practical tips for developers

Detection first. Detect RCS/Messaging capabilities before presenting a flow. If the client supports MLS/E2EE, offer “Verify via secure message” as primary option.
Branded cards. Use RCS branding and clear provenance (company name, logo) to build user trust. Keep the CTA single and explicit: Approve / Decline.
Progressive enhancement. If RCS metadata is present, enable one‑tap approval. If only basic RCS text is available, fall back to a short numeric code and warn about reduced protection.
Account linking UX. Prompt users to enroll a stronger second factor (passkeys, authenticator apps) during their next login or after suspicious activity.

Operational and vendor considerations

Choose vendors with operator relationships. Not all messaging gateways expose the attestation and verified sender features. Pick partners who work directly with carriers in your target markets.
Run A/B experiments. Measure security and conversion metrics to justify deprecating SMS OTPs. Important KPIs: fraud incidents prevented, MFA completion rate, fallback frequency, and user drop‑off.
Prepare incident playbooks. Carrier incidents and key rollovers (GSMA keys) will happen. Plan for revocation handling and emergency fallbacks.

Metrics to track for success

RCS verification adoption rate (percentage of eligible users who completed verification via RCS).
Fallback rate (RCS → SMS or push). High fallback may indicate coverage or UX problems.
Mean time to authenticate (MTTA) and user completion time.
Incidents where SMS was abused vs. incidents where RCS attestation prevented fraud.
False rejection rate for attestation (legitimate users blocked by bad attestation signals).

Future predictions (2026–2028): what to plan for now

Regional convergence on attestation standards. Expect the GSMA and major carriers to converge on standardized attestation JWT formats by 2027, making cross‑operator validation easier.
Passkeys + carrier attestation becomes default for mobile‑first flows. Combined device‑bound passkeys and carrier number attestation will be the recommended anti‑account‑takeover pattern for fintech and marketplaces.
Regulator focus on consented attestation. Privacy regulators will require stronger consent UX for operator‑based identity signals; proactive PKI key management from operators will become more visible.
Decline of SMS OTPs for high‑value flows. By 2028, expect major enterprises to have removed SMS OTP for transaction confirmation and password resets across most commercial markets.

Checklist: concrete steps to update your authentication roadmap this quarter

Run SMS‑to‑RCS capability probes and store aggregated capability maps by region.
Pilot RCS verified cards for low‑risk verification tasks; instrument conversion and fraud metrics.
Integrate carrier attestation verification and plan storage/retention policies that respect privacy rules.
Adopt a force‑ranked factor strategy: passkeys → RCS verified → signed push → TOTP → SMS last resort.
Train support and Ops on fallback flows and incident response when carrier attestations fail or key rollovers occur.

Bottom line: RCS E2EE and operator attestation materially improve messaging security, but only as part of a layered MFA strategy that emphasizes device binding, passkeys, and adaptive risk controls. Use RCS to reduce friction where it proves trustworthy, but retain fallbacks and strong privacy controls.

Next steps and call to action

Your immediate action: run a capability inventory and launch a low‑risk RCS pilot this quarter. If you need a starting template, adopt the 4‑phase roadmap above and instrument five KPIs (adoption, fallback rate, MTTA, fraud events, false rejections) to guide the rollout.

Need help designing the pilot or validating carrier attestation tokens? Our engineering team at findme.cloud specializes in integrating RCS‑aware MFA flows, carrier attestation verification, and privacy‑first logging for enterprise identity platforms. Contact us to schedule a 30‑minute technical review and get a tailored pilot plan that fits your target markets.

Resources & further reading

findme

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.